<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Darwin Among the Prototypes</title>
	<link>http://squeak.funkencode.com/2008/02/10/darwin-among-the-prototypes/</link>
	<description>Community and Code for Squeak Smalltalkers</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laurence</title>
		<link>http://squeak.funkencode.com/2008/02/10/darwin-among-the-prototypes/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://squeak.funkencode.com/2008/02/10/darwin-among-the-prototypes/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>@Randal - you're right, I knew about it - our buddy Dan was big on it but I had a Sony MagicCap and never played with the Newton  

@Alan - true if one takes a very broad view of machines as transformers of energy. From that perspective all organic things and many larger inorganic(oceans, planets, stars etc.) bodies are clearly machines as well.  Even &lt;a href="http://croquet.funkencode.com/2006/08/04/the-virtual-is-real-just-follow-the-money-or-the-physics/" rel="nofollow"&gt;bits, being made up of the same real physical stuff as humans&lt;/a&gt;, are machines - science and religion may have more in common than either likes to admit :-) In any case I'm all for expanding the narrower, industrial-era view of machines as long as we &lt;a href="http://www.meshverse.com/2008/01/31/humans-in-the-loop/" rel="nofollow"&gt;keep strictly biological humans in the loop&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Randal - you&#8217;re right, I knew about it - our buddy Dan was big on it but I had a Sony MagicCap and never played with the Newton  </p>
<p>@Alan - true if one takes a very broad view of machines as transformers of energy. From that perspective all organic things and many larger inorganic(oceans, planets, stars etc.) bodies are clearly machines as well.  Even <a href="http://croquet.funkencode.com/2006/08/04/the-virtual-is-real-just-follow-the-money-or-the-physics/" rel="nofollow">bits, being made up of the same real physical stuff as humans</a>, are machines - science and religion may have more in common than either likes to admit <img src='http://squeak.funkencode.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> In any case I&#8217;m all for expanding the narrower, industrial-era view of machines as long as we <a href="http://www.meshverse.com/2008/01/31/humans-in-the-loop/" rel="nofollow">keep strictly biological humans in the loop</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Lovejoy</title>
		<link>http://squeak.funkencode.com/2008/02/10/darwin-among-the-prototypes/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Lovejoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://squeak.funkencode.com/2008/02/10/darwin-among-the-prototypes/#comment-279</guid>
		<description>People are machines, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are machines, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randal L. Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://squeak.funkencode.com/2008/02/10/darwin-among-the-prototypes/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Randal L. Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://squeak.funkencode.com/2008/02/10/darwin-among-the-prototypes/#comment-271</guid>
		<description>You missed one of the more interesting applications of prototypes: the Newtonscript programming language for the Apple Newton!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed one of the more interesting applications of prototypes: the Newtonscript programming language for the Apple Newton!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javascript - Still Object-Oriented :: Darwin Among the Prototypes</title>
		<link>http://squeak.funkencode.com/2008/02/10/darwin-among-the-prototypes/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Javascript - Still Object-Oriented :: Darwin Among the Prototypes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 04:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://squeak.funkencode.com/2008/02/10/darwin-among-the-prototypes/#comment-270</guid>
		<description>[...] my interest in prototypes that I found Javascript appealing! The name of this entry is taken from a post on my Squeak blog that traces my history of exploring prototype-based programming. One thing that most of these [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] my interest in prototypes that I found Javascript appealing! The name of this entry is taken from a post on my Squeak blog that traces my history of exploring prototype-based programming. One thing that most of these [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
